“We don’t need to write to learn computer sciences”: Writing Instruction and the Question of First-year, Later or Not-at-all

Melissa Wong

Abstract


This paper discusses the perceptions of computer science students towards a multidisciplinary writing curriculum that was built into a pathway programme to undergraduate study. A qualitative descriptive investigatory study revealed that computer science students in particular felt a strong disconnect between their disciplinary learning and the learning they did in the academic literacy classroom. The degree to which they experienced the pedagogical and assessment differences between the two learning contexts resulted in mild to strong resistance towards the literacy development aspect of the pathway curriculum. This paper highlights a case where first year computer science students articulates their dissatisfactions in this regard, and explores the question of when computer science students should be taught academic literacy, if it is taught it at all.


Keywords


computer science; academic literacy; pathway, first year; writing, pedagogy; assessment

Full Text:

PDF HTML

References


ACM. (December, 2013). Computer science curricula 2013: Curriculum guidelines for undergraduate degree programs in computer science. Retrieved 26 November, 2015 from http://www.acm.org/education/CS2013-final-report.pdf

Anewalt, K. (2003). A professional practice component in writing: a simple way to enhance an existing course. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 18(3), 155-165.

Beatty, S., Collins, A., & Buckingham, M. (2014). Embedding academic socialization within a language support programme: An Australian case study. The International Journal of in First-year Higher Education, 5(1), 9-18.

Dochy, F., Segers, M., Gijbels, D. & Struyven, K. (2007). Assessment engineering: breaking down barriers between teaching and learning, and assessment. In Boud, D. & Falvhikov, N. (Eds.). Rethinking assessment in higher education: learning for the longer test. London: Routledge.

Drexel, P. & Andrews, R. (1998). Writing in Computer Science courses: an e-mail dialog. Plymouth State College Journal of Writing Across the Curriculum, 9, 60-68.

Duff, P. A. (2010). Language socialization into academic discourse communities, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 169-192. Doi: 10.1017/S0267190510000048

Dugan Jr., & Polanski, V. G. (2006). Writing for computer science: a taxonomy of writing tasks and general advice, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 21(6), 191-203.

Elder, C. & O’ Loughlin, K. (2003). Investigating the relationship between intensive EAP training and band score gains on IELTS. IELTS Research Reports, (vol. 4), (pp. 207-254), Canberra: IELTS Australia.

Etherington, S. (2008). Academic writing and the disciplines. In P. Friedrich (Ed.). Teaching Academic Writing (pp. 26-58). London: Continuum.

Fee, S. B. & Holland-Minkley, A. M. (2010). Teaching computer science through problems, not solutions, Computer Science Education, 20(2), 129-144.

Garvey, A. (2010, March). Writing in an upper-level CS course. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM technical symposium in Computer Science education (pp. 209-213). ACM.

Gee, J. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: ideology in discourse (3rd edn.). Basingstoke: Falmer.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of

qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.

Hyland, K. (2002). Specificity revisited: how far should we go now? English for Specific Purposes, 21.

Hyland, K. & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 1-12.

Hyland, K. & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1, 1-12.

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. London & New York: Continuum.

Hynninen, N., & Kuteeva, M. (2017). “Good” and “acceptable” English in L2 research writing: Ideals and realities in history and computer science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 30, 53-65.

James, M.A. (2006). Transfer of learning from a university content-based EAP course. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 783-806.

James, M. A. (2010). An investigation of learning transfer in English-for-general academic-purposes writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, 183-206. DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2010.09.003

Johns, A. M. (1998). The discourse communities dilemma: identifying transferable skills for the academic milieu. English for Specific Purposes, 7(1), 55-60.

Klinger, C. M. & Murray, N. (2012). Tensions in higher education: widening participation, student diversity and the challenge of academic language/literacy. Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning, 14(1), 27-44.

Ladd, B. C. (2003). It’s all writing: experience using rewriting to learn in introductory computer science. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 18(5), 57-64.

Lea, M. R. & Street, B.V. (June, 1998). Student writing in higher education: an academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172.

Lea, M. R., & Street, B. (1999). Writing as academic literacies: Understanding textual practices in higher education. In C. N. Candlin & K. Hyland (Eds.), Writing: Texts, processes and practices (pp. 62-81). London: Longman.

Lea, M. R. & Stierer, B. (2000). Student writing in higher education: new contexts. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

Lea, M. R. (2004). Academic literacies: a pedagogy for course design. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 739-756. DOI: 10.1080/0307507042000287230

Lea, M. R. & Street, B.V. (Fall, 2006). The “Academic Literacies” model: theory and applications. Literacies of and for a Diverse Society, 45(4), 368-377.

Lee, M. N. N. (1999a). Education in Malaysia: Towards Vision 2020, School Effectiveness and School Improvement. An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 10(1), 879-906. DOI: 10.1108/03090560810891055

Leki, I. (2003). Living through college literacy: nursing in a second language. Written Communication, 20, 81-98.

Leki, I. (2006). Negotiating socioacademic relations: English learners’ reception by and reaction to college faculty. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(2), 136-152.

Michael, M. (2000). Fostering and assessing communication skills in the Computer Science context. In Proceedings of the 31st SIGCSE Technical Symposium, 52-54.

Monroe, J. (2003). Writing and the disciplines. Peer Review, 6(1), 4-7.

Monroe, J. (Ed.). (2006). Local knowledges, local practices: writing in the disciplines at Cornell. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Nelson, S. (2000). Teaching collaborative writing and peer review techniques to engineering and technology undergraduates. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. (Oct18-21, 2000), 1-5.

Read, J. & Hayes, B. (2003). The impact of the IELTS test on preparation for academic study in New Zealand. IELTS research reports, (vol.5) (pp. 237-262). Canberra: IELTS Australia.

Somerville, E. & Crème, P. (2005). ‘Asking Pompeii questions’: a cooperative approach to writing in the disciplines. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(1), 17-28.

Spack, R. (1997). The acquisition of academic literacy in a second language: a longitudinal case study. Written Communication, 14(1), 3-62.

Street, B. (1983). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: critical approaches to literacy development. London: Longman.

Walker, H. M. (1998). Writing within the computer science curriculum. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 30(2), 24-25.

Wingate, U. (2006). Doing away with ‘study skills’. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 457-469.

Zamel, V. & Spack. (Eds.) (1998). Negotiating academic literacies: teaching and learning across language and cultures. New York & London: Routledge.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Melissa Wong